Methodology

How Blokaro Verify works

Every score is built from observable signals, weighted transparently, and explained in full. No black boxes. Here is exactly how we do it.

The eight categories

A verification score is the weighted combination of eight category sub-scores. The weights reflect how strongly each dimension predicts whether a project is transparent, structurally sound and low-risk — not whether it is a good investment.

CategoryWeight
👤 Team Transparency
How transparent and verifiable the people behind the project are.
18%
🛡 Security & Audits
Security audit history, code review, exploit track record.
16%
🪙 Tokenomics
Supply schedule, unlock cliffs, insider concentration, dilution risk.
15%
⚖ Regulatory Standing
Legal classification and standing across major jurisdictions.
12%
🔗 On-Chain Health
Genuine market activity, volume-to-cap turnover, holder distribution.
13%
⚙ Development Activity
Development maturity and ongoing contributor activity.
12%
💧 Liquidity & Listings
Market depth and the quality of venues it trades on.
8%
📰 Press & Reputation
Independent press coverage and reputational history.
6%

How signals become a score

Within each category, the engine evaluates a set of signals — individual, observable facts. Each signal contributes points out of a maximum. For example, in Tokenomics a high circulating-supply ratio earns more points than a project where 80% of tokens are still locked and due to unlock.

Signals are aggregated into a 0–100 category score, then the eight category scores are combined using the weights above to produce the overall score. Because every signal is recorded with its label, value and source, a Pro subscriber can trace exactly why a score is what it is. There is no hidden adjustment.

Grade bands & verdicts

The 0–100 score maps to a letter grade and one of three verdicts.

AAA
90–100
Verified
AA
80–89
Verified
A
70–79
Verified
B
58–69
Caution
C
45–57
Caution
D
32–44
High Risk
F
0–31
High Risk

⚖ Editorial integrity

Projects can pay for a thorough manual review, but payment buys the process, never the outcome. A reviewed project that scores poorly is published exactly as scored. We have no exchange affiliations, run no token sales, and accept no payment to alter a score. This independence is the entire point.

Limitations

Verify scores are analytical estimates, not financial advice. They measure transparency and structural risk signals — not investment merit, future price, or absolute safety. A high score is not a recommendation to buy; a low score is not proof of fraud. Automated scores rely on available public data, which can be incomplete or lagged. Always do your own research and never rely on a single source.

Found something we got wrong? Tell us — corrections are part of staying credible.